Evaluation of nutrition facts and of the physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of different brands of pasteurized and UHT milk

Authors

  • Simone Weschenfelder Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Porto Alegre
  • Marcelo Pinto Paim Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Porto Alegre
  • Carin Gerhardt Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Porto Alegre
  • José Maria Wiest Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Porto Alegre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.v73n1p32

Keywords:

legislation, milk, quality.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether different brands of pasteurized and UHT whole milk meet the labeling standards and technical regulations on identity and quality established by the Brazilian legislation. Ten whole milk brands, including two pasteurized milk brands and eight UHT milk brands, were evaluated. With respect to labeling, all brands were in accordance with the standards required by the legislation. In the case of one pasteurized milk brand and three UHT milk brands, at least two of the five batches analyzed were not in accordance with the standards for fat percentage, defatted dry extract, peroxidase, and counts of viable strict and facultative aerobic mesophilic microorganisms. The results show that four of the 10 brands studied require better monitoring of the milk processing steps since processed foods offered to the population must meet the standards established by the legislation, which are synonymous with quality and safety for those who consume them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2016-03-31

Issue

Section

ANIMAL QUALITY PRODUCTS

How to Cite

Evaluation of nutrition facts and of the physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of different brands of pasteurized and UHT milk. (2016). Bulletin of Animal Husbandry, 73(1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.v73n1p32

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 > >>